Compare real-world fit, not spreadsheet noise.
Pick two products and tune the verdict around travel, hybrid work, wildlife, resale safety or pure value. GearAtlas weighs carry size, ecosystem cost, market timing and ownership risk in one calm decision surface.
Visual
Estimated
Workflow
Canon EOS R5 Mark II
Full-frame - 620g
Fujifilm X100VI
APS-C - 521g
Workflow lens
Canon EOS R5 Mark II and Fujifilm X100VI are nearly tied for travel and everyday carry.
Fujifilm X100VI leads on carry and size by 22 points.
Fujifilm X100VI leads on resale strength by 11 points.
Fujifilm X100VI leads on value and market timing by 13 points.
Camera size studio
Relative body dimensions
Front, back and top views are drawn from external dimensions so the size relationship stays proportional.
View
Mode
Canon EOS R5 Mark II
Front view / 132 x 92mm
132 x 92 x 72mm
Fujifilm X100VI
Front view / 128 x 75mm
128 x 75 x 55mm
Width
Height
Depth
Weight
External dimensions and carry delta
Fujifilm X100VI is 4mm narrower than Canon EOS R5 Mark II, Fujifilm X100VI is 17mm shorter than Canon EOS R5 Mark II, Fujifilm X100VI is 17mm thinner than Canon EOS R5 Mark II, and Fujifilm X100VI is 99g lighter than Canon EOS R5 Mark II.
Fujifilm X100VI includes its lens in the body envelope, while Canon EOS R5 Mark II still needs a lens attached.
Canon EOS R5 Mark II
Fujifilm X100VI
Class benchmarks
Sensor comparison
Sensor size to scale
×1 crop
×1.53 crop
Full-frame captures ~2.4× the sensor area of APS-C, a real low-light and depth-of-field edge.
Decision matrix
Scores tuned for travel
Highlighted specs
Only specs that change the decision
Sensor
45MP stacked full-frame
Sensor
40.2MP APS-C X-Trans 5 HR
Video
8K/30p
Stabilisation
5-axis, up to 6 stops
Viewfinder
Hybrid OVF/EVF
Community comparison
Owner consensus · not specsCommunity comparison appears once owners vote on these products — 6 more votes across the pair will unlock it.