GearAtlas
Visual comparison studio

Compare real-world fit, not spreadsheet noise.

Pick two products and tune the verdict around travel, hybrid work, wildlife, resale safety or pure value. GearAtlas weighs carry size, ecosystem cost, market timing and ownership risk in one calm decision surface.

Body fit

Visual

Kit cost

Estimated

Verdict

Workflow

Hasselblad X2D 100C

Creator gear - 620g

$10,446.25
Fujifilm X100VI camera official product image

Fujifilm X100VI

APS-C - 521g

$2,190.63

Workflow lens

AI-style verdicttravel

Fujifilm X100VI is the stronger fit for travel and everyday carry.

Fujifilm X100VI leads on carry and size by 27 points.

Fujifilm X100VI leads on resale strength by 12 points.

Fujifilm X100VI leads on value and market timing by 25 points.

Workflow score

Hasselblad X2D 100C60
Fujifilm X100VI71
Open winning profile

Camera size studio

Relative body dimensions

Front, back and top views are drawn from external dimensions so the size relationship stays proportional.

View

Mode

132mm
92mm

Hasselblad X2D 100C

Front view / 132 x 92mm

132 x 92 x 72mm

128mm
75mm

Fujifilm X100VI

Front view / 128 x 75mm

128 x 75 x 55mm

Width

Hasselblad X2D 100C132mm
Fujifilm X100VI128mm

Height

Hasselblad X2D 100C92mm
Fujifilm X100VI75mm

Depth

Hasselblad X2D 100C72mm
Fujifilm X100VI55mm

Weight

Hasselblad X2D 100C620g
Fujifilm X100VI521g

External dimensions and carry delta

Fujifilm X100VI is 4mm narrower than Hasselblad X2D 100C, Fujifilm X100VI is 17mm shorter than Hasselblad X2D 100C, Fujifilm X100VI is 17mm thinner than Hasselblad X2D 100C, and Fujifilm X100VI is 99g lighter than Hasselblad X2D 100C.

Fujifilm X100VI includes its lens in the body envelope, while Hasselblad X2D 100C still needs a lens attached.

Hasselblad X2D 100C

132 x 92 x 72mm121cm2 face / 874cm3 body / 620g

Fujifilm X100VI

128 x 75 x 55mm96cm2 face / 528cm3 body / 521g

Class benchmarks

WeightTypical 650g
Hasselblad X2D 100C: 620gFujifilm X100VI: 521g
ThicknessTypical 74mm
Hasselblad X2D 100C: 72mmFujifilm X100VI: 55mm

Sensor comparison

Sensor size to scale

Hasselblad X2D 100CMedium format44×33mm
×0.79 crop
Fujifilm X100VIAPS-C23.5×15.6mm
×1.53 crop

Medium format captures ~4.0× the sensor area of APS-C, a real low-light and depth-of-field edge.

Decision matrix

Scores tuned for travel

Portability
Hasselblad X2D 100C52
Fujifilm X100VI79
Video
Hasselblad X2D 100C46
Fujifilm X100VI46
Autofocus
Hasselblad X2D 100C72
Fujifilm X100VI58
Ecosystem
Hasselblad X2D 100C54
Fujifilm X100VI58
Resale
Hasselblad X2D 100C84
Fujifilm X100VI96
Market
Hasselblad X2D 100C73
Fujifilm X100VI47
Value
Hasselblad X2D 100C48
Fujifilm X100VI73

Highlighted specs

Only specs that change the decision

Sensor

100MP medium format BSI

Sensor

40.2MP APS-C X-Trans 5 HR

Storage

1TB internal SSD

Stabilisation

5-axis, up to 6 stops

No highlighted counterpart

Viewfinder

Hybrid OVF/EVF

No highlighted counterpart
No highlighted counterpart

Community comparison

Owner consensus · not specs

Community comparison appears once owners vote on these products — 6 more votes across the pair will unlock it.